Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Use Any Surface as a Touchscreen - OmniTouch - Video



Watch the video to see how users can create a screen, move an image on the screen, zoom in and out, paint using a palette of colors, select buttons on a menu.

This week, Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon researchers are unveiling OmniTouch, a system that turns any surface into a touchscreen.

Composed of a depth-sensing camera and laser-based pico projector (more on that in a second), the contraption looks like a flattened-pancake version of R2D2 and sits on the user’s shoulder.

The user first creates a screen wherever he or she likes — such as a hand, arm, wall, table or pad of paper — and then, just like with any other touchscreen, uses fingers to navigate it.

The screen is created with the laser-based pico projector, which is an electronic system placed on a tiny chip. It transforms the image into an electronic signal, which then sparks laser lights of different colors.

Those in turn get copied and projected by mirrors, pixel-by-pixel, onto the selected surface.

The depth-sensing camera then detects when a user’s fingers are touching the “screen” (the surface the user has designated) and “pressing” a button on it.

To get the technology to work, the researchers needed to teach the system how to recognize fingers, which are crucial to the technology because they create screens, select buttons, zoom in and so on.

They dissected the qualities of fingers and developed a method for determining when a finger was “clicking” on something.

Researcher Hrvoje Benko said:
In this case, we’re detecting proximity at a very fine level. The system decides the finger is touching the surface if it’s close enough to constitute making contact. This was fairly tricky, and we used a depth map to determine proximity. In practice, a finger is seen as “clicked” when its hover distance drops to one centimeter or less above a surface, and we even manage to maintain the clicked state for dragging operations.
The technology was unveiled at the 2011 UIST, a conference on innovations in the ways humans interact computer in Santa Barbara, Calif., from October 16-19. Benko and Carnegie Mellon Ph.D. student Chris Harrison and Andrew D. Wilson of Microsoft wrote about the technology in this paper.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Microsoft Courier and Moodboards in action



Do you use moodboards as part of your design process. Well, we believe that working with moodboards is considerably more effective than producing multiple design concepts.

They have the advantage of being quick and easy to produce. This means that, unlike design concepts, they are disposable. You can try lots of different approaches to find the one that works for both you and the client.

However, they can be tricky to produce. Inexperienced web designers can often overwork moodboards, making them more like a design concept than a useful tool for brainstorming and firming up some initial ideas.

Although the Courier technology looks very impressive, what really impressed was the moodboard, created to show off the technology. This is a good example of a moodboard in action and demonstrates the kind of look and feel a moodboard should have.

Of course we don’t all have fancy (and as yet non-existent) tablets to create this kind of thing on. However, all of this could just as easily be achieved using a Wacom Bamboo Pen and Touch.

Friday, December 4, 2009

The Economists Cloud Debate: Microsoft

The rise of cloud computing is not just shifting Microsoft’s centre of gravity. It is changing the nature of competition within the computer industry.

Technological developments have hitherto pushed computing power away from central hubs: first from mainframes to minicomputers, and then to PCs.

Now a combination of ever cheaper and more powerful processors, and ever faster and more ubiquitous networks, is pushing power back to the centre in some respects, and even further away in others.

The cloud’s data centres are, in effect, outsize public mainframes. At the same time, the PC is being pushed aside by a host of smaller, often wireless devices, such as smart-phones, netbooks (small laptops) and, perhaps soon, tablets (touch-screen computers the size of books).

Although Windows still runs 90% of PCs, the fading importance of the PC means that Microsoft is no longer an all-powerful monopolist. Others are also building big clouds, including Google, a giant of the internet, and Apple, renowned as a maker of hardware, with a market capitalisation that now exceeds those of both Google and IBM, its original arch-rival (see chart above).

Read More.....

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Paul Allen, Microsoft cofounder has been diagnosed with lymphoma.

The 56-year-old Allen was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma earlier this month, according to a letter sent by his sister, Jody Allen, to employees of his investment company Vulcan. It is a non-Hodgkin's form of the disease. Allen left Microsoft in 1983 after being diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease.

"This is tough news for Paul and the family but for those who know Paul's story, you know he beat Hodgkin's a little more than 25 years ago and he is optimistic he can beat this, too," Jody Allen said in the e-mail, sent Monday.

"He continues to work and he has no plans to change his role at Vulcan," she added. Vulcan spokesman David Postman confirmed Jody Allen sent the e-mail on Monday.

Read More here..........

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Windows 7 install trick saves up to $100 but is contra license rules

Computerworld - Users can do a "clean" installation of Windows 7 using an upgrade license to save $80-$100 over the price of a "full" edition, a popular blog reported today.

According to Paul Thurrott, who writes the Supersite for Windows blog, Microsoft's upgrade media and product keys can be used to do a full installation of Windows 7 on PCs that do not have an earlier version of the OS.

Microsoft's Windows 7 upgrades are designed to do "in-place" or "custom" installs on PCs running Windows XP, Windows Vista or one of the preview editions of Windows 7. But Thurrott said that a few simple steps lets users install upgrade editions, which are considerably cheaper than the full versions designed for fresh installations.

Windows 7 Home Premium, for example, costs $119.99 as an upgrade, but $199.99 for the full edition, a difference of $80. The full versions of Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate, however, cost $100 more than the corresponding upgrades.

Nearly three years ago, Thurrott showed users a similar trick with the then just-released Vista; that technique, however, required users to install Vista twice.

Today, Thurrott spelled out how to conduct a clean install using a Windows 7 upgrade license. The process requires users to install but not activate Windows 7 with the accompanying product key. After the installation is completed, users must make a minor change to the Windows registry, use the Windows "rearm" command, then reboot.

"When Windows 7 reboots, run the Activate Windows utility, type in your product key and activate Windows," Thurrott said. "Voila!"

The rearm command can also be used to run a copy of Windows 7 for up to 120 days without activation, a trick that Microsoft confirmed two months ago.

Microsoft allows users to install and run any version of Windows 7 for up to 30 days without requiring a product activation key, the 25-character alphanumeric string that proves the copy is legitimate. The rearm command can be used as many as three times at the end of each 30-day grace period to extend the activation-free ride for approximately four months.

Some users commenting on Thurrott's blog reported that they were able to do a clean install using a Windows 7 upgrade key without resorting to his registry hack and the rearm command. Thurrott, however, was skeptical.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Fake Conficker.B Infection Alerts Impersonate Microsoft

An ongoing spam campaign is once again attempting to impersonate Microsoft’s security team — the same campaign was first seen in April — by mass mailing Conficker.B Infection Alerts (install.zip), which upon execution drop a sample of the Antivirus Pro 2010 scareware.

Whereas the theme remains the same, the botnet masters have slightly modified the message:

“Dear Microsoft Customer,

Starting 18/10/2009 the ‘Conficker’ worm began infecting Microsoft customers unusually rapidly. Microsoft has been advised by your Internet provider that your network is infected. To counteract further spread we advise removing the infection using an antispyware program. We are supplying all effected Windows Users with a free system scan in order to clean any files infected by the virus.

Please install attached file to start the scan. The process takes under a minute and will prevent your files from being compromised. We appreciate your prompt cooperation.

Regards,
Microsoft Windows Agent #2 (Hollis)
Microsoft Windows Computer Safety Division”
The use of email as propagation vector for scareware campaigns (The ultimate guide to scareware protection), and in particular the use of email attachments is an uncommon practice, compared to the single most effective way of hijacking traffic through blackhat search engine optimization where the cybercriminals rely on real-time news events.

The campaign is an example of a — thankfully - badly executed one in the sense that with Microsoft’s Security Essentials recently gained momentum, even the average Internet user would notice the suspicious timing of the offered “antispyware program”.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Microsoft Security Intelligence Report - Extracts

Here’s a look at the five most important aspects from the full Microsoft Security Intelligence Report.

1. Vulnerabilities (the response and reaction to them) vary, depending on whether the target is at work or home.

Based on data provided by its enterprise Forefront Client Security and consumer Windows Live OneCare, Microsoft found that vulnerabilities are very different. Why? A corporate user may have email and Internet limitations that reduce the attack surface. A home user has more software tools to be infected but less critical data at risk.

Simply put, a home user is more likely to get hit with a Trojan attack to extract bank and credit card details, etc. In the enterprise, the weapon of choice is the Worm attack, which is primarily destructive and disruptive.

The greatest difference between enterprise and home vulnerabilities is social engineering. Microsoft explains:

  • The Windows Live OneCare list also includes several families associated with rogue security software, such as Win32/Renos, Win32/FakeXPA, and Win32/Antivirus2008.
  • The social engineering messages used in connection with rogue security software may be less effective in an enterprise environment, where malware protection is typically the responsibility of the IT department…
  • By contrast, the Forefront Client Security list is dominated by worms, like Win32/Autorun, Win32/Hamweq, and Win32/Taterf.
  • Worms rely less on social engineering to spread than categories like trojans and downloaders do, does and more on access to unsecured file shares and removable storage volumes, both of which are often plentiful in enterprise environments.

2. Users don’t always remove unwanted software: There’s great appeal to the procrastinator in the “ignore” button.

  • Microsoft explains one nuance of the malware issue:Software cannot always be classified in binary terms as “good” or “bad.”
  • Some software inhabits a gray area wherein the combination of behaviors and value propositions presented by the software is neither universally desired nor universally reviled.
  • This gray area includes a number of programs that do things like display advertisements to the user that may appear outside the context of the Web browser or other application and which may be difficult or impossible to control.

Microsoft’s scans allow users to ignore a security alert, allow software to remain, issue a prompt, quarantine or remove it.

If software is really malicious it is removed without user input. The gray areas appear when users have a choice.

Microsoft adds:
  • These decisions are influenced by a number of factors, such as the user’s level of expertise, how certain they feel about their judgment regarding the software in question, the context in which the software was obtained, societal considerations, and the benefit (if any) being delivered by the software or by other software that is bundled with it.
  • Users make choices about what to do about a piece of potentially unwanted software for different reasons, so it’s important not to draw unwarranted conclusions about their intent.

Moderate or Low threats are often ignored by users, who think that there’s value in the software. These threats are keepers based on user behaviour:

3. Rogue security software (Scareware) gains momentum.

The concept of rogue security software is pure genius. Malicious hackers prey on the fears of users, cook up bogus security software and extract payments to keep your PC running. Microsoft notes that rogue security software is becoming a hot category.

Microsoft reports:

  • Rogue security software authors have long attempted to exploit this trust by giving their programs generic, anodyne names, like “Antivirus 2009,” and making them resemble genuine security software in many ways.
  • Recently, many threats have taken this approach a step further, posing as components of the operating system itself or as a familiar search engine.
  • One of the first families observed to exhibit this behavior was Win32/FakeSecSen, which was added to the MSRT in November 2008 and was the eighth most prevalent family in 2H08 overall.
  • Win32/FakeSecSen adds an icon to the Control Panel named Vista AV or MS AV and fraudulently uses the same four-colour shield icon as the Windows Security Center. Double-clicking the icon launches the rogue software, which claims to detect a large number of nonexistent threats and urges the user to “activate” the software by paying for it.

Win32/Renos is a longtime threat that delivers rogue security software. It was the most prevalent threat in the second half of 2008. Two new trojans–Win32/FakeXPA and Win32/FakeSecSen were the seventh and eight most prevalent family class.

4. Social networking phishing attacks represented less than 1 percent of attacks, but yielded a big chunk of phishing impressions.

Translation: Social networking sites will remain a big phishing target.

Microsoft explains:
  • A typical social network phish is likely to trick an order of magnitude more users than a typical financial phish. There are a number of explanations for this discrepancy.
  • While financial institutions targeted by phishers can number in the hundreds, just a handful of popular sites account for the bulk of the social network usage on the Internet, so phishers can effectively target many more people per site.
  • In addition, phishers often use the messaging features of the sites themselves to distribute their attacks, typically by gaining control of a user’s account and using it to send phishing messages to the victim’s friends.
  • These attacks can be much more effective than e-mail–based attacks, because they exploit the considerable level of trust users place in their friends.

Take a look at:

And.

5. Malware is dominant in the U.S. and accounted for 67 percent of all infected computers.

Trojans—the miscellaneous variety–were detected on 29.4 percent of infected computers. Among other items:

  • Five of the top 20 families detected in the United States in Q3 and Q4 of 2008 (Win32/Renos, Win32/FakeXPA, Win32/FakeSecSen, Win32/Antivirus2008, and Win32/Winfixer) download rogue security software or display misleading warning messages to convince users to purchase a program that supposedly removes spyware.

Here are the top five individual threats:

Trojan downloaders and droppers were detected on 24.4 percent of all infected computers.

I trust this was of interest to you and you will see the sense of protecting your computer(s) with known and trusted anti Virus software as well as setting up a good Firewall and Intrusion detection. The rise and rise of Malware across the globe means that you will also need to protect your system(s) from this menace.

Do your research, read the reviews and never be the first to try any new protection software.