Showing posts with label service delivery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label service delivery. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Friday, June 4, 2010
The Future of Local Government

There are huge pressures on Local Government to link services and deliver a shared provision. This isn’t just between neighbouring councils, we are seeing a real push towards regional and national shared service providers. In addition, we are seeing links to 3rd sector agencies to provide and deliver public services.
The Cloud
The cloud is having a big impact on ICT services in councils and it is clear that the level of transformation required to cope with this, will require additional investment in ICT but it is unlikely that a single council could justify the spend on its own. Therefore, we would need to look at a shared arrangement for regional and national cloud services, possibly a public sector cloud. Here the Government Cloud is driving people’s thinking and will have a head start in this area, if it is managed properly.
Budget
Financial pressures on councils is making them seriously consider what services they can afford and establish priority levels for their specific local areas. Total Place will drive an approach which will inevitably bring 3rd sector and communities themselves to the table as service providers in some instances.
Directgov
Central Government’s apparent success with Directgov will be used as a model for local government, to drive out efficiencies and to provide efficiency benefits and cost savings for local government transactional services. This will be achieved, either through an enhanced LocalDirectgov portal or directly offered through Directgov but there will be close links needed, whatever happens.
Transparency
The drive for transparency and an open data policy, will allow a greater level of local innovation by social innovators and entrepreneurs and in some instances delivering council services directly, in a more usable and useful way.
A greater push for more local involvement in decision-making and greater transparency to enable citizens to provide scrutiny and shape services directly.
The Impact
What this essentially does is completely break down local government and disbands the silo mentality of individual organisations who are unconnected, uncoordinated and in many cases duplicating functions.
The Local Service Provision
This future vision sees the only aspect of local government to remain local is the 'last mile', or the actual service delivery and decision making. The organisation behind it will be held in the cloud; a mix of closely linked, local, regional, national and cloud based services all supporting an individual worker, to deliver a service to someone in a community. The worker in question may be an independant trader or part of an outsourced agreement, under the control of the local, regional or national government, facilitated via the cloud but not directly employed by the council,
Benefits
This will imply that local government will become simply the conceptual, and management control layer, allowing greater transparency and openness, radical approaches to service delivery and support services. Therefore, the only aspect of local government that needs to be focussed on will be the People in the Community.
This will be a difficult path to walk, a political hot potato in most areas and would need to bring forward a great outcome. If successful, and if properly controlled and implemented, this approach could help to drive out the inefficiencies in local government and offer greater local involvement in service design and creation.
Labels:
Cloud Computing,
government,
implementation,
local,
National,
provision,
regional,
service delivery
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Effective ITIL project leadership: Plan-Do-Check-Act
Effective ITIL project leadership: Plan-Do-Check-Act
The first step in the Plan-Do-Check-Act process is to have an executive address ITIL stakeholders at all project kick-off meetings.
This falls under the "Plan" and "Do" activities and also shows the team that the ITIL program has leadership support.
If a CIO or senior executive doesn't attend the kick-off meeting, project support is questioned and that immediately weakens the team and the leader's ability to direct the program.
Following the kick-off meeting, leaders execute the "Do" portion of the cycle by simply following the same process as the rest of their team.
When you talk about "Plan-Do-Check-Act" in ITIL, the "Do" really means that leaders must set the example and establish a culture where the senior executives follow the process like any other employee.
One CIO I have worked with took this a step further and communicated to the entire company how he followed the process. He did this after receiving an irate call from a senior executive who claimed the service desk was not giving him the priority he deserved.
After sharing the process and his own service desk requests with the executive, the CIO pinned the list on every local notice board and in the service desk operations room to give the technicians a tool for response when they were getting pressure to increase the priority of certain tickets.
Shared via AddThis
The first step in the Plan-Do-Check-Act process is to have an executive address ITIL stakeholders at all project kick-off meetings.
This falls under the "Plan" and "Do" activities and also shows the team that the ITIL program has leadership support.
If a CIO or senior executive doesn't attend the kick-off meeting, project support is questioned and that immediately weakens the team and the leader's ability to direct the program.
Following the kick-off meeting, leaders execute the "Do" portion of the cycle by simply following the same process as the rest of their team.
When you talk about "Plan-Do-Check-Act" in ITIL, the "Do" really means that leaders must set the example and establish a culture where the senior executives follow the process like any other employee.
One CIO I have worked with took this a step further and communicated to the entire company how he followed the process. He did this after receiving an irate call from a senior executive who claimed the service desk was not giving him the priority he deserved.
After sharing the process and his own service desk requests with the executive, the CIO pinned the list on every local notice board and in the service desk operations room to give the technicians a tool for response when they were getting pressure to increase the priority of certain tickets.
Shared via AddThis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)